March 22, 2005
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Attention: DHM-10
US Department of Transportation
400 7th St. SW
Washington, DC 20590-0001
Petition for Rulemaking
The Dangerous Goods Advisory Council (DGAC) petitions for rulemaking pursuant to 49 CFR 106.95, for the addition of a new paragraph
(e) to 49 CFR 173.4.
INTRODUCTION
DGAC is a non-profit educational organization that promotes hazmat transportation safety by providing classroom training,
seminars and conferences, and participation in domestic and international regulatory activities in its promotion of not only
safe, but also efficient transportation of hazardous materials/dangerous goods in commerce.
BACKGROUND AND SUPPORT FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENT
The pharmaceutical industry ships thousands of compounds annually in their efforts to discover innovative therapies for
cardiovascular disease, metabolic and infectious disease, and cancer. The primary facilities involved in supporting their
research activities include, but are not limited to, hospitals, universities, research and analytical laboratories, and
clinics, a number of which operated by state and federal government agencies.
Most of these compounds are packaged for shipment in inner receptacles, each containing less than one gram of a solid or
one milliliter of a liquid. For example, a presently used shipping configuration for shipment of compounds for support
of high throughput screening processes is the use of inner units called well plates. Each well (inner receptacle) of a
plate contains less than one gram or milliliter of a compound and is sealed to prevent contamination or commingling with
other materials. The well plates are then placed in strong boxes, the result being combination packagings as defined in
49 CFR 171.8. While various configurations of well plates are utilized, a well plate containing 96 wells is common. I should
add that the Food and Drug Administration heavily regulates these containment units for maintenance of compound integrity.
Many materials shipped by the industry are novel compounds. Some have been synthesized in quantities totaling no more than
two or three grams at a cost of many thousands of dollars. Experience has demonstrated that most of these compounds do not
meet the criteria for classification as hazardous materials. Of the few that do, most fall within Division 6.1, Packing Group
III. Based on the desired therapeutic properties of the compounds, their potential toxicity is expected to be the primary
concern. However, a retrospective analysis of compounds that have been advanced to a research stage (their therapeutic
properties justify further development) show that few are ultimately classed as hazardous materials for transport. For example,
we offer the following table submitted by a member company that analyzes their current research compounds for their
classification status:
| |
NUMBER OF COMPOUNDS |
PERCENT OF TOTAL |
| Current Number of research compounds in active development that are classed for transport |
1547 |
--- |
| Of those, the total number classed in Division 6.1 |
241 |
15.6 |
| Of those, the total number classed in Division 6.1, PG I |
3 |
0.19 |
We believe that, due to their quantity and form, shipments of these compounds, including those novel compounds with incomplete
classification profiles, in quantities of less than one gram or one milliliter per inner receptacle, present such a low potential
risk under any conditions of transport they should not be considered subject to the hazardous materials regulations if the conditions
we propose are followed. Therefore, we request a new exception be added to the Hazardous Materials Regulations to eliminate
unnecessary impediments to the discovery and development of medicines that will enhance the quality of life of people throughout the
world.
By “impediments” we mean costly delays, limited access to service, and per package surcharges as high as $40 per package. One DGAC
member alone estimates an annual cost of approximately $1 million because of such impediments.
We recognize that it may not be appropriate for certain classes of hazardous materials to be included in this type of exception.
Therefore, we are not requesting that the exception we propose, based on a shipper’s knowledge, apply to PG I classification of any
hazard class; nor to the following classes and division: 1, 2, 7, and Division 6.2.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
We petition PHMSA to amend the Departments Hazardous Materials Regulations by adding a new paragraph (e) to existing §173.4 as
follows:
§173.4 Small quantity exceptions
…
(e) Except for a material in class (or a division thereof) 1, 2, 6.2 and 7, and a material assigned packing group I, a small quantity
of a hazardous material, including a material that may be subsequently classed as a hazardous material, is not subject to the
requirements of this subchapter when offered for transportation in a combination packaging and –
(1) The maximum quantity of material per inner receptacle does not exceed one (1) mL if a liquid, or one (1) gram if a solid; and
(2) The completed package is offered for transportation in conformance with sub paragraphs (a) (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), and (9) of
this section.
Due to the significance of this petition for the advancement of public health, we request expedited handling of this petition.
If there are any doubts or concerns about any aspect of what we propose, we will come to your office with experts, samples of packages,
or any other information you require to move this action to completion. We thank you in advance for taking prompt action on the matter.
Sincerely,

Alan I. Roberts
President